Problem filesonic with FDM 53286i

[tonyy2999]

I used FDM with hotfile, it works perfectly.
I swifted to filesonic lately, but FDM has problem from filesonic.
Could you help?

[Guest]

I used FDM with hotfile, it works perfectly.
I swifted to filesonic lately, but FDM has problem from filesonic.
Could you help?

I also have the same problem and sent a note to FDM and did not hear back from them.

J is not that great and would weather use FDM it is far better

Paul

[Guest]

Yep same here, can't d/l from Filesonic. It's a real shame as FDM does everything else great, mutiple folders for different s, shutdown pc when finished and multiple ways to grab the .

I suppose it's free and you can't expect much .

[PChammer]

I suppose it's free and you can't expect much

Or it's Filesonic you can't expect much from perhaps.

quote from filesonic...

http://www.filesonic.com/faq#faqManagers

Can I resume broken s?

Yes, but only if you own a . s the use of -accelerators which allow you to resume incomplete s. They even help you faster through the use of segmented s. This means, you can the same file with many streams, resulting in increased -speeds

and...

I cannot files at all! What's wrong?

If you do not have a FileSonic , certain restrictions may prevent you from ing: We do not allow more than one concurrent per IP address and also limit the amount of data you can from our servers within a certain timespan. If you share your IP address with other FileSonic s (e.g. because your ISP uses proxies or NAT), you may be adversely affected by their activities.

AND the kicker...

Which manager should I use?

In order to get the best experience with managers, we recommend using the latest version of Jer. You can it for free from http://jer.org

Perhaps it's not a coincidence here? A plug for Jer maybe? If you search, you will find that more people, even with s are being restricted to using Jer.

Just my opinion, they are (as many others) scratching each others backs and other ers may be a 3rd wheel or unwelcome entity.

[VitaMistic]

Just piling on the mix. Same here problem ing...

[alientech]

Filesonic and cramit both stopped working at the same time so this mght be due to a software upgrade since they both seem to use similar software I bet the core is the same. But cramit started working again since they pump FDM and it has to work with it while filesonic pumps some er you have to pay $30 after using it for 30 days. I use jer for now but thats written in JAVA and it slows down the computer during high speed transfers and its not so good when your connection gets dropped 50 times a day. Filefactory also has a simple client now for up and ing and that works better than most bloated fatware. So I might start using that but you need filefactory. Still its fast and takes very little memory. RSM is not bad now but I dont like it much and even with all the functions it has, I dont trust RS anyway.

I just installed 3.5RC and now filesonic works. I was using 3 something before since I could not find a link to 3.5rc even with all the news on it until someone posted a link the post. Seems its the first link in the first post in this forum. Dont know how I missed it but when you look hard enough you wont find it. I tired to using v3 with file sonic a few hours ago and it did not work So I am pretty sure its 3.5 that fixed it but I did write a very nasty message to filesonic. V3 was working and I stopped a to use the browser and when I went to restart the it said server cant resume. I tried using IE to to filesonic web page since thats the only way FDM would work with s but that did not help and neither did erasing all the s and stuff and doing a bunch of stuff and then I tried to a file with cramit and that also did not work. So I sent cramit a note saying their recomendation is not working. And later that night I tried cramit again and it worked but not with filesonic.

viewtopic.php?f=1&t=15061

[coord]

Copy filesonic links to the clipboard and then paste directly into FDM and it should work ok, does for me anyway. If you just click on the link and let FDM pick it up then you will get a "bad hash" file returned. Hope this helps.

[coord]

Copy filesonic links to the clipboard and then paste directly into FDM and it should work ok, does for me anyway. If you just click on the link and let FDM pick it up then you will get a "bad hash" file returned. Hope this helps.

I forgot to mention that obviously you need a premiun and so far I don't think there is a way to resume s once interupted so it would be a good idea to have a mirror link to continue the if possible, anyway I am going to try a few thing and will update the post if anything works.

[Davo]

I just installed 3.7RC and that doesn't work with Filesonic. Maybe I'll give 3.5RC a try, as somebody has suggested.

Internet Manager works beautifully with Filesonic, by the way. Filesonic recommends you use the cumbersome Java-based Jer to grab their files. I would avoid Jer where possible.

[Alex]

FDM can't work with Filesonic due to bug in their server's code. Why don't you ask Filesonic to fix their bugs instead?

Internet Manager does not work "beautifully" with it also. It could not resume stopped in our tests (we used their ).

[Alex]

3.8 BETA 2 has full for FileSonic site when using Internet Explorer or Firefox browser.
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=15602

[bovirus]

I tried to use the new 3.8 beta 2 with my of Filesonic.
Don't work.
I add "www.filesonic.com" and "filesonic.com" in "Sites manager" but I cannot the file.

Jer works fine.

Which is exactly the bug of Filesonic Server?

If you explain more details we can ask as to fix it.

Thanks.

[Usher]

Jer works fine.
Which is exactly the bug of Filesonic Server?
If you explain more details we can ask as to fix it.

You can file Filesonic.com advertising on Jer.org site. I'm afraid Filesonic don't do anything to fix their website for other managers.

[Alex]

I tried to use the new 3.8 beta 2 with my of Filesonic.
Don't work.

What browser do you use?

Please provide step-by-step details on how you add the from FileSonic to FDM.

[Alex]

Which is exactly the bug of Filesonic Server?

If you explain more details we can ask as to fix it.

It does not accept info for temporarily generated (by their server) URLs.

For example, you have URL:
http://www.filesonic.com/file/SOME_NUMBER_HERE/file.dat

You can add it in FDM and specify info - this will work.

But if you add from browser, it sends temporary URL instead, e.g. :
http://s218.filesonic.com//SOME ... 045665f8b4.

For such URL it ignores and sends 403 Bad Hash error. We made workaround, but it works with Internet Explorer and Firefox browsers only.